• mihnt@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    As someone who has pulse just the way they want it, what will this mean for me?

    Is it a forced change on a current install?

    Is there an equivalent to PulseEffects for PipeWire?

    • navordar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      Actually, PulseEffects has been renamed into EasyEffects and is PipeWire only now

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s Easyeffects. I don’t know if it is equivalent but it certainly has more features than I could ever hope to be able to use.

    • rien333@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      There’s a compability layer, generally called pipewire-pulse. I think it’s not a one-for-one copy, but it works great for desktop applications that expect pulse.

      Some things that previously were pulseaudio modules, like rtp and raop (airplay), have been reimplemented as native pipewire modules, I believe.

      More complicated setups I can’t personally speak to, but since pipewire is also catered towards professional audio workflows (as opposed to just desktop audio), you should at least be able to replicate what you have now.

      And, as others have already pointed out, pulseeffects has been long dead, and now lives on as easyeffects.

      • mihnt@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        PulseEffects is still working fine for me is why I was asking. Been using it for the past year after making the switch.

    • Destide@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I find Easy effects is much more feature rich easier to import APO files and such