Queer people are getting their rights violated and removed in real time, and now we have ppl from all across the political spectrum arguing over a flag I have never seen before.

At this point, I’m convinced that the flag is an intentional psyop designed to sow division in the community over colours on a rectangle to distract from actual issues.

  • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 months ago

    Idk, I appreciate the progress pride flag because it explicitly includes trans, intersex and poc. There’s a decent number of people who would consider themselves part of “the community” and use the standard rainbow flag, who don’t consider any identities past LGB. Its nice to be able to signal to people that you are genuinely a safe person/group/whatever who cares about the whole community and their struggles.

    • Mikufan@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      No. POC? Do you know how gay Asians are treated? Or eastern Europeans?

      One flag for all and thats the normal rainbow. Singling out specific groups is racist.

      Im ok with a black stripe, as a remembrance to the Aids crisis. But the other stuff is already included and does not need more than the normal rainbow.

      The rainbow stands for anyone, its not exclusive to sexuality or gender, it stands for both.

      • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m leaving this comment up because I think it’s fine to point out that the rainbow stands for anyone. But I’m also leaving this reply here to let you know that you need to disengage with this thread. Insisting that a pride flag is racist is not exactly creating a welcoming environment here or being nice to people who feel included with specific flags which highlight their identity.

        • Mikufan@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          So a pride flag that is clearly textbook racist is good and arguing against it and the people that say its better because of the racism is not allowed here? Ok.

          • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
            shield
            M
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            So a pride flag that is clearly textbook racist is good and arguing against it and the people that say its better because of the racism is not allowed here

            when you call them racist and imply they’re segregationist for having their preference, yes, that is not allowed. that’s needlessly aggressive and needlessly sectarian—and speaking personally, “having a preference for more stripes on a flag that represent marginalized communities is racist and like segregation” is just such an overstatement of the point (that i otherwise agree with, for the record—i am not a fan of the progress flag) being made that it verges into being unserious.

            • Mikufan@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Im not implying that, its just a fact that treating people differently based on skin colores is racist. If thats in a positive way or a negative one, is completely irrelevant. Its racist.

              • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                8 months ago

                i don’t think “adding race-specific stripes to a pride flag” is a bad thing, is “treating people differently based on skin tone” except in the most cringeworthy, pedantic, I See No Color way possible, or is “racist”—and i think that if you believe these things you probably will not be allowed to partake in discussions like this on our instance after today

                • Mikufan@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  If you say so. I don’t think its ok to be racist, but if you think differently ban me for being against racism and saying a all inclusive rainbow is all inclusive.

                  • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    18
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    That’s such a strawman reply. Nobody in this conversation thinks it is okay to be racist. You would not be banned for being anti racist, and implying that you would be is part of what you’re doing wrong here.

      • CyberEgg
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I feel more includet in the Progress Flag than the standard Rainbow. That’s just me, but why should that be less valid?

          • CyberEgg
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s just wrong. The Rainbow Flag represents LGBT Pride and does not include BIPOC.

            I don’t know why you don’t like the progress flag, but it’s not racist and it’s not transphobic and it’s not segregating. It highlights the diversity of human rights movements and points out that all human rights movements have the same goal and should work together.

              • iso@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                8 months ago

                There is no racism against whites, idiot. You aren’t being denied jobs, getting houses, being shot by the police for no reason, or being harassed on the streets openly because you’re white.

                Stop bitching around and deal with the fact that you’re not a king/queen/monarch anymore you absolute moron.

                Sorry for the tone, but this shit pisses me off.

                • Mikufan@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Lmao, tell that to Romanians or Polish or Russians/Ukrainians or Jews or Hungarian.

                  There is 100% racism against so called white people. But this isn’t about white being not included, this is about treating people differently based on skin colores, wich is already given by putting brown on the flag because its singling them out, even the goal of highlighting the most oppressed part of LGBT is absolutely dogshit as, for example many Asians are treated way worse when they come out as gay.

                  Im very against the whole “white people” thing as most northern Eurasien humans are kinda white and discriminate against each other very very much.

                  Discrimination isn’t just about your slavery problem you have in USA its just all treating people differently because they look a little different.

              • BakerBagel@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                So this whole discourse is why I don’t like adding to the rainbow flag for specific groups. Once you add a distinction to represent a specific group, every group then wants to be included, creating a giant mess. It’s the classic “a camel is a horse designed by a committee” problem. That's why the EU decided to use this abstract and all inclusive flag over this nightmare that included every EU member state.

                I understand that every non-cishet group faces their own unique challenges, discrimination, abuse, and hatred, but the whole point of the rainbow flag is to show that we are all united together.

                • iso@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  As a trans person who’s been harassed and excluded at an LGBT event, I don’t feel represented by a rainbow at all anymore. Go do your thing LGB, since I’m not welcome I’m doing mine. If you show me that I’m allowed to be part of you (by putting my thing back into yours) I’m coming back.

                  • BakerBagel@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Yeah, terfs suck, but that’s not the fault of the flag. The rainbow is supposed to be the unifying symbol to unite the various other symbols. The entire purpose is that it doesn’t represent an entire any specific group, but the unity of the spectrum of human sexuality. I’m not arguing against the idea of the progress pride flag, I’m simply saying that trying to be inclusive by adding group specific symbols to what is supposed to be a unifying flag is inherently exclusionary, since groups that don’t get inclusive symbols included now feel excluded. In fact, i like the idea of adding a pile onto the standard Rainbow flag for people to express their personal identity.

                    For another example of this dilemma, look at the Union Jack for Terf Island/ The UK. It’s supposed to represent the unity of the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland, yet there are actually 4 countries that make up the UK, with Wales being excluded entirely from the flag. Ensuring every group feels included on an overarching symbol is a never ending battle that will never be enough.