HarryLime [any]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 months agotitlehexbear.netimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1148arrow-down10
arrow-up1148arrow-down1imagetitlehexbear.netHarryLime [any]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareAbracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·8 months ago4-7 ejaculations per week is optimal in decreasing prostate cancer risk?
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-28 months agoI don’t know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
minus-squareanarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 months agoWhat if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 months agothen start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
minus-squarelemmy_99c4zb3e3@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-28 months agodeleted by creator
4-7 ejaculations per week is optimal in decreasing prostate cancer risk?
I don’t know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
What if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
then start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
deleted by creator