• 52fighters@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe a police investigator should do a little snooping. Prison would be one acceptable outcome.

    • Awwab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with jailbait wasn’t that it was illegal, it was just not a good look for a business trying to court advertising money.

      • Itty53@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hold up, the problem with jailbait is it was scantily clad little children in sexuality suggestive situations. That was the problem. Whether it was technically legal or not it’s irrelevant, it was intended to sexualized children.

        It’s “not a good look” because it’s abhorrent trash meant to skirt child porn laws. Was it illegal? No. Was it just advertisers who had a problem with it? Also no. Users thought it was abhorrent too. There were user campaigns to ban the sub all the same, who do you think kept notifying the media?

        • Grimspire@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or material that could plausibly be underage material. They used the gray zone to justify that the material was not illegal, just questionable. But the previous poster is right. The sub was never shut down for the material of the posts directly, but that it had horrible optics. Reddit never took the high road.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was, but it avoided legal issues by:

          • Reddit didn’t actually host images or videos at the time, just links and comments
          • As I recall, it wasn’t pornography, just pictures of kids in bikinis with creepy comments
          • 52fighters@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If he posted images of children, even if not pornographic, it is unlikely he held the copyright for them and, in some jurisdictions might still be considered exploitation. I hope a police investigator at least looks at it.

              • Deccarrin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                He didn’t even knowingly moderate there. There are real reasons to shirt on spez without this kind of made up shit. It just gives pro reddit morons ammo.

          • Denaton@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh god, i didn’t know what jailbait was and just tried to look it up on Reddit but couldn’t find anything, i thought it was some kind of “bad prank” stuff to bait others into doing illegal stuff…

            • Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Reddit previously allowed essentially anything that was not either illegal to post or breaking the site by organizing vote manipulation and the like. After getting negative press for subreddits that allowed sexualized (but probably not technically pornographic) images of kids, they banned that kind of content.

              Reddit positioned itself as a neutral platform with as few sitewide rules as it could have prior to that, and many didn’t like what the change signaled even if they found /r/jailbait disgusting.