Iran has struck Israel.

previous preamble

The continuing fall of the remains of the British Empire is pretty entertaining from the outside: an archaic royal family that is seemingly being smote with disease by God itself for their past crimes; a navy that virtually no longer functions, ramming into foreign ports and under constant repair; and an economy that cannot seem to stop sputtering, fucked whether they’re in the EU or outside it. Watching the impacts on people from the inside is a little more worrying, though.

A fifth of the population is in poverty, including nearly a third of all children. These figures have barely shifted since the Labour government in the early 2000s, aside from a decreasing poverty rate for pensioners. Actually, poverty hasn’t substantially shifted since Margaret Thatcher. Before her, the poverty rate was around 14%, but her catastrophic policies caused a major increase, and poverty levels since then are still 50% higher than over 50 years ago, because neoliberal economic policy since then has not fundamentally changed. Parties and corporations have impoverished the usual vulnerable groups, such as large families, minority ethnic groups (including half of Pakistani and Bangladeshi households!) and disabled people. These differences are also regional, with the North more impoverished than the richer Southeast (but some of the poorest boroughs are in London, so it’s a complex pattern).

With Corbyn’s defeat in 2019 mere months before the pandemic began, the Labour Party shifted back towards the right, with left-wingers purged from the party if they did not kowtow to Keir Starmer. This leaves us with a situation where the only substantial difference between the two parties would be on social policy, but it goes without saying that economic policy is the overwhelming factor that determines if minorities can have a decent life. Worker-oriented movements since then have been largely not under the umbrella of major party leaderships, such as the Don’t Pay movement in late 2022 that arose in the wake of dramatically rising energy prices where 3 million people vowed to not pay them (which did lead to results).

Most notably recently is the major upset in the constituency of Rochdale - the victory of George Galloway - who is the leader of the Workers Party of Britain, which describes itself as both socialist and socially conservative. This took place both in the context of aforementioned economic troubles, as well as anger over Israel’s genocide of Gaza in the British population, especially in British Muslims. It remains to be seen how much of this is an isolated event, especially as Corbyn has, understandably, refused to collaborate with Galloway due to his socially conservative stances. The UK general election will be held at some point within the next 9 months or so, and might well be a shitshow depending on what happens domestically and geopolitically before then; parallels to the current American electoral shitshow with increasing anger over Biden are pretty apparent. The Conservatives are quite likely to lose given 14 years of uninspired rule if current polling is correct, but it truly is a race to the bottom.


The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you’ve wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don’t worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.

The Country of the Week is the United Kingdom! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 months ago

    Xi Jinping held a ceremony to welcome the President of the Federated States of Micronesia to visit China.

    https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1779037694783627336

    People often say that China is not very good in soft power but this is an example of something that they unarguably do much better that the West: treating all countries, no matter how small (we’re talking Micronesia here, about 100k inhabitants), the same when their leaders visit China, with all the State’s honors and personal reception by the President.

    I don’t think Micronesia - or any similarly small country - got the same type of welcome in Washington. In fact I checked and the President of Micronesia visited Washington in 2023 and was received by… the White House’s Indo Pacific coordinator.

    This sends a clear message of respect, and of abiding by the principle inscribed in the UN Charter that all nations are the same.

    As often with China, their messaging isn’t so much in grand declarations but rather symbols that shows their commitment to certain principles. As such we often don’t get the messaging ourselves because interpretating symbols is not soo much in our culture. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have an impact. If you’re Micronesian for instance in this case, you understand the messaging extremely well.

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      People often say that China is not very good in soft power but this is an example of something that they unarguably do much better that the West: treating all countries, no matter how small (we’re talking Micronesia here, about 100k inhabitants), the same when their leaders visit China, with all the State’s honors and personal reception by the President.

      I would argue that the ability to NOT do this is a display of how significant america’s soft power is, that countries will put up with the disrespect and grovel to america anyway because they functionally are forced to. Soft power doesn’t have to mean being liked.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think both are displays of power. Being a good host and treating guests, be they friends or strangers, with all the appropriate courtesy is a huge flex in most of the world. I’m not sure how to phrase this, but a state that is stable and well run, acting in good faith, can afford to treat the leader of a much smaller country with dignity. I think the word is magnamity or something? Like, we could snub you, but we’re strong and wealthy and secure enough that we don’t need such vulgar displays of arrogance and control.

        Like, if a great guest comes to your home and you give them a great bedroom, that’s expected. If a small guest comes to your home, and your home is so large and well appointed that you can give your small guests a great bedroom, too, that’s a flex.

        “We’re so powerful we don’t need to distinguish between greater and lesser guests, we can afford to be good hosts to all of them”

        Something like that.

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think one demonstrates power while the other demonstrates resources. China has enough resources to be able to spend 24 hours of the presidents time on them, because his time is not absolutely needed for more important things.

          The US on the other hand doesn’t do that because they consider it inefficient use of the president’s time, and uses its power to not bother with it.

          I don’t know what the best approach is if I’m honest. I LIKE the Chinese approach better, obviously, but I can’t say whether one of these is objectively better or not without a level of experience in organising a presidents time that I simply do not have. I don’t know. It could well be that China’s structure just allows it to delegate other things to other people that the US would usually give to the president too.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Dunno, but if I wanted to sway people to back me when they have a genuine choice in the matter, I’d be more inclined towards China’s consistent displays of respect than the US’s casual brutality. Afaik China’s behavior towards it’s foreign affairs is very consistent. I don’t think they have anything equivalent to the US’s constant perfidy and betrayal. Even if it doesn’t sway Micronesia other nations will see China’s behavior and remember it.

            There’s some line in the bible where Jesus is like “How you treated the least of my siblings, you treated me”, and another saying somewhere that’s like “You can judge someone’s character by how they treat someone who can’t do anything for them”.

            I think being consistent and trustworthy can be a realpolitik strategy, especially when your adversary is notoriously callous, clumsy, and brutal.