I’m getting a lot of ‘but my car is more convenient’ arguments lately, and I’m struggling to convey why that doesn’t make sense.

Specifically how to explain to people that: Sure, if you are able to drive, and can afford it, and your city is designed to, and subsidizes making it easy to drive and park, then it’s convenient. But if everyone does it then it quickly becomes a tragedy of the commons situation.

I thought of one analogy that is: It would be ‘more convenient’ if I just threw my trash out the window, but if we all started doing that then we’d quickly end up in a mess.

But I feel like that doesn’t quite get at the essence of it. Any other ideas?

  • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    9 months ago

    Your car is more convenient because they designed it that way. Visit Europe and everyone’s like “get a eurail pass, it’s so convenient!” But here we don’t have the infrastructure so alternative transport sucks, because we decided to make the car, king, instead of building railway lines.

    • Guadin@k.fe.derate.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      While I do hope Europe is years ahead of the USA, I don’t know any people who say it’s convenient to do a eurail pass. Where I live there are the same problems as in the USA, the car is 1,5-2 times quicker than public transport. That’s just too much wastes time to be bothered to go by public transport.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Is your area a big tourist destination? From my perspective on the other side of the Atlantic, Americans treat Europe as a big, culture/walkability theme park. We don’t go to the car-centric wastelands that look like the U.S. looks.

      • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Depends on the types of commutes you do and where you are.

        For kindergarden to work, for me, car and public is basically equal, but it is like 7km. If it is a carshare / rental car then I will end up slower because finding a spot to park is pain, this of course is negated if it were my car since Id have (paid btw at my last employer) employee parking.

        It would of course be easier and faster to get the kinds to kindergarden via car, but this is a 15 min walking distance we are talking here.

        There are tradeoffs, but ultimately I choose transit and just grab a rental if I actually need a car, which is rare. Mind you I live in the city and the moment I move to a house outside of the city I am getting a car.

        I have to say I prefer transit, no stress, no thinking about times and routes, I can read a book, study or just meditate. Not to mention that the costs are sooo much lower. In the city I travel all month for 15 euros.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      It is political at heart. You just can’t pit the “power of the consumer” against industry interests and expect an ideal outcome. The Not Just Bikes guy, from what I hear, has given up hope for America at this point. Whatever happens, I hope other nations can learn from our example: Cave to auto and oil interests at your own peril.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        🙄 people just like their cars, it’s not some evil plot. Evening is big oils fault, never people meeting choices.

        • Thinker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          The major car manufacturers have literally been collaborating for the better part of a century, along with oil companies, to keep Americans dependent on cars. It’s a well-documented fact. Even long before Citizebs United made corporate bribery legal, they’ve been using the state’s power to quell protests, destroy non-car infrastructure, and outlaw use of our streets for anything except cars.

        • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Many cities had their convenient bus and tram line bought and dismantled by auto companies. All while under huge protest of residents too.

          It was not a natural evolution that got us here.

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      You talk to about Europe like it was a monolith. Where are I live cars are hugely more convenient than public transport.

      Public transportation may be more convenient if you live and work on city centers, everything else not so much

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m curious where you live. I was traveling well outside of the popular cities to small towns, and bikes seemed like a nicer option even when there was no tram (and there often was)

        • Calavera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          I live in the north of Portugal. Bikes(electric) might be good for single people, not for families with kids, even for single is not that safe here, most bike infrastructure is made toward leisure rather than a means of transportation