• aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re not really required by law to ‘pay attention’ unless you’re being asked a direct question. Though, I’m sure judges look poorly on such things.

      I remember Harvey Weinstein doing the same thing before he got sent to Rikers. :)

    • geekworking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not if you are not required to participate in that part and not causing a disturbance in the court.

      This is a jury trial, and jurors are watching. Even during selection. If you don’t care enough to stay awake, it’s not a good impression.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably wouldn’t fly. This happens more than you’d think. Court room procedures aren’t as riveting as tv would lead us to believe.

      • Willy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        jurors can get in trouble for it? it’s a bodily function and they are almost volunteers. I mean I can see them getting dismissed or maybe being asked if they are ok and to please try and pay attention, but I hope you don’t mean real trouble.

        • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          They are entirely responsible for determining the facts of the case. The defendant can face dramatic penalties on their decision. The cannot sleep through it.

          • Willy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            oh. now I understand. death penalty for nodding off jurors! I won’t try and get disqualified when they add that.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          There are quite a few bodily functions we are expected to control in public, with real legal consequences if we can’t. Falling asleep while driving, or (intentionally) dropping a deuce in the jurrybox during trial as some quick examples.

          • Willy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            erections? peeing your pants? farting? there are no legal consequences to any I can think of. maybe if you do them intentionally, there are indirect consequences, but we aren’t talking about grabbing a pillow and setting up for a nap in the jury box here. just nodding off.

            edit: aha I see you made an edit with examples. no fair

              • Willy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                2 months ago

                ur just silly. No one is asking you to drive in that situation. even then, you haven’t broken the law and there are no direct consequences. if you hit someone else, there are indirect legal consequences. that wasn’t totally bad though, any other examples?

                • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Ahh, my mistake. I thought we were discussing this in good faith. I’ll let you continue to be intentionally obtuse on your own now.

                  • Willy@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    sorry if that was flippant but I thought you were the one who had left good faith with your answer. agreed to agree to disagree. I stand by my original point that the juror you saw that got into trouble by nodding off was being treated badly and if they were punished it’s an injustice and a reason everyone should avoid jury duty. I hope it’s not real. have a good day.