WIP: Qt6 transition by varjolintu · Pull Request #10267 · keepassxreboot/keepassxc
github.com
Transition to Qt6. A work in progress. Continues the work from: #7783 Fixes #7774. TODO: Test Auto-Type with macOS Test with Windows Test with Linux Test with macOS MacPasteBoard Fix FdoSecr...
    • vrighter
      8·
      8 months ago

      one of the extensions has the description: “an easy flow to update passwords”

      If that has to be an extension, then this sucks

      • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlEnglish
        26·
        8 months ago

        Does KeePassXC work on the command line and over ssh connections ? pass does.

        • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
          10·
          8 months ago

          With pass, each password lives inside of a gpg encrypted file whose filename is the title of the website or resource that requires the password. These encrypted files may be organized into meaningful folder hierarchies, copied from computer to computer, and, in general, manipulated using standard command line file management utilities.

          This sounds cool, but relies completely on OpenPGP. That is secure enough, right?

          But this also means

          • no metadata security
          • no usernames
          • no comment

          It is cool, but only having a single entry means you can not replace the website with a more anonymous placeholder.

          For sure this tool sounds pretty great! Especially encrypting everything seperately is very nice.

          But sometimes getting a name might already be too much.

          Also to avoid big brother connecting all data, I normally have an entry like

          Entry: MSOffice
username: alias1+website@mail.org
password: •••••••••••••••••••••
URL: xxxxx
Comment:
   Username: xxxxxxxxx
   name: albert einstein
   birthday: 2.6.1956
   Security question 1 2 3
   TOTP backup keys: xxxx
   Random comment

          This is all not possible, which means I would need the same username everywhere, or remember it (I dont, I have 300 Keepass entries).

          In KeepassXC I have a single file. Hackers would need to bruteforce only one. But at least they wouldnt know exactly what they want to decrypt.

          • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlEnglish
            2·
            8 months ago

            Sure, I see what you mean. Note that I responded to the “this sucks” remark about pass by the other commenter. There is no one preventing you to use for example one password entry with Pass on a remote work server logging in with ssh sharing it with a colleague while having the other 100 password work entries kept in KeePassXC and then using Bitwarden for your 200 personal passwords.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
            2·
            8 months ago

            I wonder if you could just encrypt a storage which is then used by pass unencrypted. So you have double encryption using something like gocryptfs.

        • vrighter
          5·
          8 months ago

          there is the keepassxc-cli command. And it also supports ssh keys with integration with ssh-agent. So yeah

        • moon_matter@kbin.social
          5·
          8 months ago

          KeepassXC is bundled with a CLI tool. But it doesn’t have to do anything special for SSH. It’s ultimately just text and there are multiple ways to paste text into an SSH session.

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          4·
          8 months ago

          That’s not really the point though. You wouldn’t argue that you can’t use Firefox over ssh.