The decline in sperm counts is a growing concern worldwide, with rates plummeting by as much as 52% since the 1970s. This alarming trend has far-reaching implications for human health and reproduction, raising questions about the future of fertility and the potential consequences for individuals, families, and society as a whole.
Wasn’t this a result of a change in measurement technique, and these articles are just comparing the two datasets as if they’re direct equivalents? I remember seeing an explainer about this like a year ago.
There’s lots of different ways to measure sperm health and ultimately sperm count isn’t really that much of an impediment to eventually knocking someone up, unless it’s very very low - see this study graph
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-022-00626-w
17 August 2022 - Spatiotemporal trends in human semen quality