Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post, thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • froztbyte@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    Ā·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    you know, itā€™d be a damn shame if someone made one of those megalists which contained all the various places that had promptboxes that could be used to synthesize bad code without having to pay your own money to openai subscriptions or so

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      tired: stealing hundreds of dollars of electricity to mine hundreds of pennies in crypto

      wired: spiking some project managerā€™s OpenAI bill to unsustainable levels by having their chatbot generate the worst nonsense ever experienced by a human

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        8 months ago

        it feels a little mean doing this to a library, even if their use of AI is obviously doomed to failure, so a list of public access GPT prompts would be a service.

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, hospitals/libraries/schools/etc should not be things on such a list generally

          (In two minds about some of the US colleges, but thatā€™s a different kettle of barbs)

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        8 months ago

        As soon as some of these LLMs get a math module to do math correctly (And not just via the LLM lookuptable thing) people could write scripts to externalize some more intensive calculations needed for crypto mining. Sure it will be inefficient as fuck, and I doubt the chance of getting a coin reward will be low, but it will be free.

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          Ā·
          8 months ago

          last week there were a couple of articles about how easy it is to craft an input that makes public chatgpt bots execute scripts (usually as root) on their hosting containers, which is almost definitely the result of a module like that being implemented for better programming-related results (aka fucking cheating), so this is very likely already happening

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          8 months ago

          not necessarily/could be offset? openai is still in that ā€œweā€™ll set fire to money to make ourselves look goodā€ stage of VC dreamery; find entities operating on credits, slap there

          but possibly even in the case where itā€™s still straight transactional, it might be a net negative for them: revenue, actual usage, and still no meaningful shift on their product becoming good. itā€™ll just make them look even worse

          the bigger problem (to which this suggestion would most certainly contribute things getting worse) is that theyā€™re still burning other important resources. I donā€™t really have a good/clever proposal to this which isnā€™t something like ā€œwell, burn their DCs to the fucking groundā€ (or other more creative forms of invasive service interruption)

          • skillissuer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            Ā·
            8 months ago

            they will burn through that money pretty quickly and without turning profit, however this can contribute to one of their ratfucked metrics to go up, which could hype up some segment of stonk market. because now theyā€™re fueled by hype and vc money, any new thing that would sustain that hype would be a bad thing (adoption here, kinda, at least as seen through excel)

            i agree, 120mm mortar is much cheaper, faster, more irreversible, but openai going bankrupt and forced to sell their kit at least would generate less waste

            • froztbyte@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              8 months ago

              forced to sell their kit at least would generate less waste

              and a net positive in terms of human happiness