• Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    And still highly problematic to deliver such hateful imagery.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nope, a controversial joke is either funny enough to overcome its controversial nature or it isnt.

      Its not problematic, its just not funny enough.

      • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        In the context of the comment you’re defending, it isn’t clear whether it is a joke.

        Also, making such “jokes” in contexts like these, still carry a hateful message. If you don’t mean it and don’t want to shit on people like that, then simply don’t do it. It doesn’t get better to defend it as a “joke” as it is not clear what the true intentions are. As such “jokes” can also form opinions / views about some topic, it is reckless not to mind the hazards created by such “jokes”. Furthermore, stuff like this is often seen in Motte-and-bailey fallacies.

        What’s next? Laughing about all the Jews who were gased by Nazis? Or all the vicitims in Ukraine who get fucked in the ass by Russia?

        I think, there are some clear lines.