• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You think Biden is bad? Well what about this game of alternative history where something worse happens? Guess that means his support of an active genocide is actually a good thing, huh?

    Wow, you’re right. I really didn’t consider your fictional alternative history universe when forming my opinions on events in this reality.

    • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not American so maybe I got it wrong, but isn’t it possible they will be the two major candidates?

      I’d love to be wrong and we could worry about who the real nominee will be.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They will be the two major party candidates.

        But the comment I was responding to is basically saying “We have to support Biden’s genocide and turn to fascism because the GOP’s brand of facsism would be even worse”.

        Even if you accept that argument, or believe the tradeoff is worth it, those advocating it for always conspicuously leave out the moral hazard portion of that equation in regards to the message their unwavering support sends to the Democratic party leadership:

        No matter what you do, including actively contributing to a genocide, we will still vote for you to keep the GOP from power.

        Personally, I think one openly fascist party is already too much in our two party system and believe we shouldn’t take anything off the table to prevent us from having two of them.

        • Krono@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They will be the two major party candidates.

          They are 81 and 77, theres still hope one (or both) of them die before it’s too late.

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          One wonder why the Democratic Party should even bother since there will always be a boogeyman that will make them go “It’s either us… or them”.

        • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t really follow it but I see enough headlines around to wonder, all of Trump’s legal trouble aren’t going to be a barrier? It’s still allowed? The party is corrupt enough to feel confident supporting him anyway? Do I want to know the answers to these questions?

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            The Supreme Court of the United States is currently hearing arguments on whether Trump has immunity from criminal acts until Congress does the political act of impeaching in the House and convicting in the Senate. Meaning this congress or a later congress would first have to impeach, convict, and remove from office a president that is already out of office.

            It sounds silly because it is, but the justices Trump appointed appear to have his back and are prepared to make that decision in his favor.

            So we are close to seeing if Trump’s legal troubles will be politically whisked away so he can get re-elected or not.

            The party is supporting him either way, regardless of a legal ruling or any regard to the law.

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Yes, voting for the party and candidates that I want to vote for based on my own convictions - which right now doesn’t include any national Democratic candidates.

            If you’re happy with the Democratic party, then vote for them.

            If you believe that the path of Democratic party is headed on is acceptable, then vote for them.

            If you can accept that the Democratic party will only get worse from here, but believe that’s still better than the GOP, then vote for them.

            You do whatever you feel is best for you.

            • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yes, voting for the party and candidates that I want to vote for based on my own convictions - which right now doesn’t include any national Democratic candidates.

              Sure sounds nice on paper, but what do you expect to achieve by doing this?

              What do you think would happen if everyone who is disillusioned with Biden but isn’t a Trump supporter voted 3rd party?

              • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Why does my vote have to align with your internal political game theory monologue?

                Just FYI your hypothetical would be the biggest electoral defeat for an American party in modern history and would probably force the Democrats to actually to be responsive to their base.

                Think of all the policies that the Democratic base want, but that the current iteration of the party refuses to deliver on: Medicare for all, Israeli policy, Pro Act, tax reform, expanding social safety nets, etc.

                But, again, I’m just voting my own conscience. You support what your conscience tells you to.

                • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Just FYI your hypothetical would be the biggest electoral defeat for an American party in modern history and would probably force the Democrats to actually to be responsive to their base.

                  Maybe they’d learn their lesson. But if instead a non-negligible fraction don’t vote for Biden, he’ll likely still lose and the DNC definitely won’t learn their lesson.

                  But whether or not the DNC “learns their lesson” may be a moot point: the goals of the Republican Party include eroding the civil rights of LGBT, immigrants, and women, as well as dismantling our democracy in general. This is not coming from DNC propaganda, this is coming directly from the mouths of republicans, as well as examining their actions on all of these topics while Trump was in office.

                  I don’t expect Biden to make anything better. I do expect Trump to really, tangibly make things a lot worse. Again, this is no “what if”, Trump was president and did make things worse, and he and other republicans have stated their goals for next time.

                  As for making actual progress, if Biden wins this election, especially if he wins by a significant margin, then the Republican Party might rethink their strategy, which would lead to a much healthier election in the future. Additionally, after this election (if Biden wins) he won’t be able to run again and the DNC will have to pick some form of fresh blood. That’s a far better opportunity to actually work on improving the system.

                  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    So if the Democrats lose power, that will actually help their leadership retain their hold on power.

                    But if the Republicans lose power, it will actually help the party heal, presumably because it cause a change in GOP party leadership?

                    Tell me, what font of political wisdom and experience are you drawing upon to arrive at these conclusions?

                    Because as someone who’s actually lived and worked in and around party politics for most of my life, I got to tell you, what you’re saying doesn’t align with what I’ve seen.