• bamboo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    If the justification is that AM radio is useful in emergency scenarios, the sound quality is largely irrelevant. As long as you can make out instructions and warnings that might be given after a disaster (such as “Avoid area A due to flooding”, “Heated shelter available at schools”), then it’s serving its point. Whether it’s good for music or talk shows isn’t the point here.

    • distractionfactory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s also the fact that if everyone stops using AM, the RFI pollution from EVs and other tech will balloon even more than it already has. Those frequencies are used for a lot more than just emergencies. I’d bet the push for this came from the military or the FCC.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      If the justification is that AM radio is useful in emergency scenarios, the sound quality is largely irrelevant.

      Then the electric motor was running on my Civic hybrid (accelerating or braking), the only thing you’d hear on any AM station was “BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!”. Not a single word spoken or note of music was intelligible.

      AM would work okay when the car was not driving. If lawmakers want to legislate a radio that only works when the car isn’t moving, I suppose they can. It just doesn’t seem very useful to me.