• Tanoh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Exactly. And if you want those features, you install the full version. Packages can break in sid, that is the whole point of it.

    I am also running sid and keepassxc and I see no problem with this change. In fact it seems like a very sane thing to do, and something I wished more packages did.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sane move by maintainer, but he should not go around calling other people’s code crap unless there is proof that the code was actually crap with gaping security hole

      • Tanoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        He could have handled it better. But he didn’t call the code crap directly, just the bundle of everything.

        Having a meta package and let users choose seems like the best way. But this is a Debian issue, and not a keepassxc issue. It is up to Debian to package it anyway they want.

        • rushaction@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you look deeper at the recorded PR commit, comments, and package description it’s clearly straight up mean-spirited.