Foreign secretary’s call comes after group releases video of British-Israeli hostage it says died after being wounded in Israeli airstrike

David Cameron has urged the BBC to describe Hamas as a terrorist organisation, reviving an accusation that the corporation shies away from a valid description of the Islamist group that is holding Israeli hostages.

The UK foreign secretary told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg that the organisation should reconsider its guidelines in light of a video released by Hamas showing the British-Israeli hostage Nadav Popplewell, who the group said had died in Gaza.

Hamas released a statement on Saturday saying the 51-year-old had died after being wounded in an Israeli airstrike a month ago. The video showed him with a black eye.

      • qevlarr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because of what they’re saying. Actions aimed at innocent civilians for a political goal, that’s terrorism. If you’d apply that definition to one, then also apply it to the other

        • fine_sandy_bottom
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          My point is, that definition is so vague it includes every country in the world.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            So what? What makes them any different? Does going through some bureaucratic process first legitimize the murder of civilians for political reasons?

            • fine_sandy_bottom
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              It makes the use of the term terrorism an “appeal to emotion”.

              This type of logical fallacy is how people prop up weak arguments.

              There’s plenty of more appropriate words to describe Israel’s behaviour, but the comment I replied to is using “terrorism” given the emotional significance.

              Ironically, his comment cites the BBC editorial guidelines explaining my point. Terrorism is an emotionally charged term.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Nobody stated that “terrorism” isn’t an emotionally charged term.

                It’s kinda funny you’re talking about weak arguments when you completely avoided the question in my comment. It seems your only justification for why Israel’s (or many other government’s) actions can’t be labeled terrorism is “everyone else is doing it too” but that doesn’t really make a difference nor does it make the label incorrect.