“we have Dahir insaat at home” ass monorail

    • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      if it’s on one rail you could have them pass each other without needing to build a second set of tracks or relying on sidings to exist

          • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh God that’s even worse. Guaranteed collisions via an unnecessary slow-moving part that is assumed to always function correctly.

            Rail comes in pairs already so that you only have to build one engineered area, tunnel, bridge, etc. This is a bazinga idea.

              • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yes I read the article and that ambiguous language doesn’t challenge what I said.

                This is a really bad idea. The kind cooked up by academic transportation grifters looking to take a pile of money from the government to do a bad idea with the right buzzwords. This is how the bazinga industrial complex works.