☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmygrad.mlEnglish · 1 year agoChina to tighten the rules on use of facial recognition technologywww.scmp.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up125arrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up122arrow-down1external-linkChina to tighten the rules on use of facial recognition technologywww.scmp.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmygrad.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareEdward@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoBesides how awful this website is, with all the stuff popping up and in, and having something breaking the article every 2-3 paragraph, can the journos write even a single thing about China without “uighurs” and Xinjiang in it?
minus-squareDamarcusArt@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI’m just surprised they managed to go the whole article without mentioning Tienanmen square. I guess Xinjiang is just the same sentiment.
minus-squarerjs001@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoIt’s South China Morning Post. They aren’t going to be good articles. Very conservative bias
minus-squareLemmygradwontallowme [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIt’s a mixed shit bag, isn’t it?
minus-squareidahocom@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt’s a newspaper by *xpats for *xpats lmao.
Besides how awful this website is, with all the stuff popping up and in, and having something breaking the article every 2-3 paragraph, can the journos write even a single thing about China without “uighurs” and Xinjiang in it?
I’m just surprised they managed to go the whole article without mentioning Tienanmen square. I guess Xinjiang is just the same sentiment.
It’s South China Morning Post. They aren’t going to be good articles. Very conservative bias
It’s a mixed shit bag, isn’t it?
It’s a newspaper by *xpats for *xpats lmao.