• slurpyslop@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    yeah because if musk wasn’t involved, lemmy’s community always loves news on the latest ai hype cycle

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah yes, the wrong kind of technology.

      If it’s a “hype cycle” I guess it’ll be going away aaaaaany day now.

      • slurpyslop@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ah yes, the wrong kind of technology.

        what point do you think you’re making here?

        it’s /c/technology, not “/c/unquestionedpraisefortechnology”

        If it’s a “hype cycle” I guess it’ll be going away aaaaaany day now.

        my guy even people within the ai r&d sphere acknowledge that it’s a hype cycle

        • Stardust@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think maybe you meant to link to AI Winter (which that link has a link to down at the bottom) as that article doesn’t really support your point (that people within AI acknowledge it has hype cycles) at all, there’s nothing about AI directly in it, although it does serve a refutation that ‘hype cycle’ means it’ll go away; if that’s what you meant your sentence was a bit odd.

          • slurpyslop@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            the citation is because the only way you could claim ai isn’t in a hype cycle at the moment is if you don’t know that that’s a defined term within tech spaces