• Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The article is dated back in February. I’m not seeing it pick up steam. I’m seeing it being forgotten.

    Regardless, we should really use the correct phrasing here. We’re pushing for a 32 hour workweek standard. Calling it 4 day is stupid because everyone just says four 10hr days.

    • scoutFDT@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always see this, a 4 day week being equated to 4 - 10 and it always leaves me baffled that people think we have to work 40 hours. No we fucking don’t. 40 hour work week was implemented when automation was but a fraction of what it is today. Heck one can even argue that we can half the working hours to 20 and still be fine.

      • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, agreed 100%. 32hr workweek should just be a first step or transition to 24, then even less. Automation, AI, and everything should benefit all of us not just the billionaires.

      • Double_A
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess the argument is that you could even have it without changing the amount of hours.

    • walnutwalrus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess 4/32 would be most accurate, but I think a lot of these pushes for four day weeks are not for 10 hour days but 32 hours with fulltime pay

      some are calling for 6 hour days whether on 4 or 5 day weeks which is another topic for discussion in perhaps anotger post or here as well

    • WookieMunster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      For a 32 hour work week to be viable we would need the pay to match a 40 hour work week at least. I doubt we will get both if one even

    • TopShelfVanilla@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I already work 4 10s. Factory work is what it is. Sometimes we get forced for Fridays too. Hell, overtime is the only way to make any real money. I don’t have a point, just sharing my experience.

  • nieceandtows@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Work From Home was a big cultural change for the country, and we all see how that went (even after initially lauding it). I’m not holding my breath on this. Anything that reduces stress on the employees would never get commonplace, because stress is how they keep the workers in check.

      • nieceandtows@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every single company now wants everybody to come back to office, even those who worked remote before Covid. Even zoom, whose very business is keeping people at home is making their employees return to office.

        • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dunno about every single company, but I’m sure the handful that want it are really happy this is the impression you’re getting

              • nieceandtows@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t have a direct line with every single company in the world, but I do have this thing called a figure of speech. RTO is a pretty big trend right now, you only need to search the news and find out about it. Not sure why you’re trying to prove that there is at least one company in the world that doesn’t want people to return to office.

                • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because it’s a handful (woa, figure of speech!) dominating the news because they have an agenda. There’s still plenty of WFH options out there, and there is also news about companies forcing RTO to bleed top talent.

                  Not sure why you’re riding so hard for RTO.

  • lichtmetzger@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m doing a real four day workweek since the beginning of this year and I’m never going back. And by “real” I mean 4x8 hours.

    There are so many companies out there trying to push 4x10 as a benefit. Dude…that’s just the same amount of work in one day less. I want to get more work life balance, not burn myself out faster than before.

    A lot of old farts telling people like me we are too lazy and need to work harder. Their rage is my fuel. Since the economy is fucked anyway and working late into the night only benefits my employer, I might as well just take a little salary loss and do the things I like instead.

    • Qfuiyh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since productivity is similar over 5x8 and 4x8 surely 4x10 just means more hours of mouse wiggling right?

  • nicetriangle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t even work for someone and I fully support this. 5 day work week is an artifact of a different time.

    Life isn’t about working.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Definitely. I’m pretty sure the vast majority of Americans would love to have the social services available in most of Europe (vacation time, parental leave, universal healthcare, universal college-level education, etc.). They just have no idea it’s even an option.

          My favorite is always American boomers complaining about universal healthcare being “socialist”…while being on Medicare. I give up.

  • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    4-10s is common in heavy industry. Same number of hours, but you get a lot more weekend and weekends with stats are even better.

    I’ve worked such a work week, and would heartily endorse it.

    • spacebirb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk why someone always brings up 4-10s every time, it’s a completely different thing. We want 8 hour days, 4 days a week.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it’s a thing that actually exists, doesn’t result in a pay or benefits cut, and people who experienced it actually like.

        • kite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not everyone. I hated it. A lot of times, 4 10s is actually 4 11s, because they make you take a lunch but you still gotta get those 10 actual work hours in. After a while, it was just brutal and exhausting. Bonus points of suck are awarded if you have to deal with coworkers who think you’re just getting a freebie day off for nothing and turn into assholes.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone working in IT, this sounds horrible for productivity. I can barely remain productive for a full eight hours, longer days would exacerbate the problem.

      Probably better to have 5-6 for me. Almost the same as 4-8 but you cut only the least productive hours so it’s more efficient.

      • Elle@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbh having a set amount of work hours across jobs comes across as unwise. Each job is going to have different sorts of demands and the length of work sessions & number of breaks should be adjusted accordingly for each.

        For some jobs a longer work session with sufficient breaks may prove better, whereas other jobs, absolutely not, it becomes performative rather than productive.

        • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. Try telling a firefighter working a Kelly schedule they now have to work 5 8 hr days with weekends off.

          You will no longer have firefighters. How every job being different is lost on people I know not. Probably all the tech bros thinking their experience is the norm.

      • SamanthaStankey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree. 8 hours is a struggle. You get 5 hours of serious focused attention from me…then I lose steam and half heartedly answer questions and fight to keep my eyes open and focused or zone out in a meeting. But the 5 hours I do is laps around my coworkers and solid friggin work. Also to note I work remote and it’s the only reason my 5 hours is so fruitful.

        10 hours would be a nightmare.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why it’s perfect. Just screw around for the extra hours and you get another day that isn’t tainted with work stank. Just having work that day ruins the day for me. 4x8 is ideal, but I’d settle for 4x10.