Germany wants to be climate neutral by 2045. But a panel of government climate advisers says it’s already in danger of missing a key target to cut planet-heating emissions by the end of the decade.

Germany’s climate advisory body has called for new policy measures to slash greenhouse gas emissions, warning that the country looks set to miss its 2030 climate change targets.

In a report published on Monday, the Council of Experts on Climate Change said Germany was unlikely to reach its goal of cutting 65% of emissions by the end of the decade compared to 1990 levels.

The panel, which is appointed by the government and has independent authority to assess the country’s climate performance, said sectors such as transport and construction in particular were struggling to decarbonize.

The findings contradict statements from German Climate Protection Minister and Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck, who said in March that projections from the Federal Environment Agency (UBA) showed emissions were falling and Germany would meet its goal.

  • Halcyon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Coal usage is going down constantly. Coal is being phased out completely until 2035.

      • Halcyon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Electricity production from coal and oil combined shrank from 55.6 GW in 2010 (before the phasing out of nuclear power plants began) to 42.2 GW in 2023. No one “turned on coal/oil” to compensate nuclear energy.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ya’ll have issues with logic it seems.

          You know what you could have done? Shrank coal and oil combined EVEN MORE! And by your own sources production capabilities were increasing. Why would they be doing that if the goal is to get rid of it all together? There is a cost to building that production capability you know. But at this point I’m talking to brick walls. None of you can actually string together a valid reason why nuclear was killed in FAVOR of the shit polluting the air.

          • Halcyon
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t know who you’re talking to. I didn’t make any of these politics.