data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70850/7085050ad8e46145f993d3925502edcbfb5ed380" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ca00/6ca00aaf2088544694fdab762103e1b767a6ac16" alt=""
Es war noch nie eine gute Idee, eine Partei nach einer einzelnen Person zu benennen.
Es war noch nie eine gute Idee, eine Partei nach einer einzelnen Person zu benennen.
Let’s also stop using terms like Gen Z or Boomers altogether. They are often used by the media to make articles seem more interesting to certain target groups. But from a scientific point of view, they are about as meaningful as zodiac signs.
“Here’s why Cancers can’t keep their money together and why Scorpios nevertheless are constantly jealous of their standard of living.”
Raucher, die Züge aufhalten, sind die schlimmsten.
Yep, that looks like a scar of a cesarean section.
Stop tipping culture. Pay your workers.
Deutschland, das Land der Digitalisierung! ** hust **
You don’t rob a bank. Banks are robbing you.
So wie zu der Zeit hier?
Mit der “Strategie 18” erzielte die FDP letztlich 7,4 %.
Diesmal werden es hoffentlich nur 4,7 %.
Thanks, giving this a try.
Yes, listening to whole albums is not only great with albums you already know, but it’s also my favourite way to get to know new artists. A single song is often not enough to understand the whole picture or range.
Well, seems to be an old-fashioned approach. But I’m also not the type of person who has music blare in the background all day. So I don’t like the radio-like approach by Spotify to just let anything play what the algorithm thinks is fitting.
On Bandcamp Fridays, Bandcamp waives their revenue share and passes the complete funds directly to artists.
I was asking a question, so yes, I wanted to know how other people see this and how people use the music queue.
Of course I’m sure that there are many different ways to interact with Spotify and I don’t think that any specific type of use is superior.
But since I don’t let the algorithms influence my music selection very much, the problem described in the article doesn’t have that big an impact on my everyday life.
I’m not saying that I think Spotify’s approach is right. I would like a much more user-friendly music player anyway, unfortunately I find Spotify quite cumbersome and inflexible.
Apart from that, I think that artists should get a bigger share for the use of their works.
No, I don’t think that and I did not write anything like that. I was just sharing my perspective. And was interested in learning how other people use the player.
I don’t know, do you people let Spotify decide that much about what you hear? I normally never let the music run through so that automatic recommendations play, but I choose explicitly what’s added next in the queue. So the problem mentioned in the article is not relevant to me at all.
DIE FETTEN JAHRE SIND VORBEI
We shouldn’t even bother to compare, the loop thing in Las Vegas is not a transport system, it’s an amusement ride.
Was du als “Holz-Klasse” beschreibst, ist doch bei innereuropäischen Flügen längst der Economy-Standard. Kostenfreie Getränke sind gestrichen, Displays gibt es keine, und Steckdosen sowieso nicht.
ah, Ars Technica noticed that OpenAI lifted the block on “David Mayer”, but there still are other names:
Brian Hood
Johnathan Turley
Johnathan Zittrain
David Faber
Guido Scorza
deleted by creator
Da gibt es nichts mehr zu prüfen. Kernkraft ist träge und unwirtschaftlich.
Joe Kaeser, Aufsichtsratschef von Siemens Energy: “Es gibt kein einziges Atomkraftwerk auf der Welt, das sich ökonomisch rechnet”, sagte er in der ARD-Sendung Maischberger vom 27. November 2024.
https://www.tagesschau.de/faktenfinder/farbebekennen-weidel-faktencheck-100.html?at_medium=mastodon
In einem Faktencheck des Fraunhofer Instituts zum Thema Atomenergie heißt es: “Beispielsweise müssten für anfallenden Atommüll etwa 2,5 Milliarden Euro Deckungsvorsorge aufgebracht werden. Insgesamt wären beachtliche kurzfristige Investitionen erforderlich.” (für den Neubau eines Kraftwerks)
https://www.ikts.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ikts/abteilungen/umwelt_und_verfahrenstechnik/technologieoekonomik_nachhaltigkeitsanalyse/oekonomische_analyse_nachhaltigkeit/241030_Fraunhofer-Faktencheck_Kernenergie.pdf