• Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    No such thing as bad publicity so might as well have an acquaintance’s life-size barbie embarrass you with a milkshake.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      an acquaintance’s life-size barbie embarrass you with a milkshake.

      Because women are property in the mind of @ghyste@sh.itjust.works

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Of course the horribly sexist comment was intended as a joke. A sexist joke is sexist.

          • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Calling someone a life sized Barbie is a sexist comment, but writing the comment makes the commenter sexist in the same way that playing the T-1000 makes Arnold Schwarzenegger an android from the future.

            • psud@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I had more of a problem with the ownership words than the description of the woman as looking Barbie-like

              • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Still, you’re not getting it. The commenter is speaking from the perspective of the type of person who would do this. They are doing so to mock that type of person. If you give the commenter the benefit of the doubt, assuming that they are not on the side of the rightwing psychopaths they are explicitly criticizing, then it makes sense.