• MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    There is a screenshot of the opt-in screen in the article. There is no default, just two buttons to say yes or no.

    I swear, outrage should only be allowed based on the amount of work one is willing to put in before expressing it. If you don’t do the reading, you don’t get to be publicly angry. It’d save us all so much trouble.

    For the record, the feature was always optional, as per the original announcement. Presumably the change is it is now part of the setup flow where it was going to be a settings toggle instead.

    Which is, incidentally, how this used to work the first time Windows had this feature, back when it was called “Timeline” in Windows 10.

    • Geyser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The screenshot doesn’t show preceding flow to reach it, but I did miss the “requires windows hello to enable” bit, which does suggest that wherever it is, it would have to be opt-in.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It doesn’t because that’s one of the four or five screens during the initial Windows setup where you opt in and out of all the other spyware features. They all look the same and are prompted in sequence. Unless they’re doing something very weird you absolutely have to make a choice on each of them and they are unskippable otherwise.

        I mean, you don’t have to know, if you don’t know Windows you don’t have to recognize them. But if you do it’s pretty obivous, so you… you know, could have asked or looked it up.

        Or gone through the link, because come on, you didn’t. You were obviously just reacting to the headline.

    • Ibuthyr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The problem with MS is how they change these things in the future. It may be a clear choice now, but they will find a way to make it easier to “accidentally” opt in, or they’ll simply change it to an opt-out. They’ve been doing this sort of bullshit for quite some time now.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        They really haven’t. Their onboarding flow has included this exact type of forced option for advertising data, location data and bug reports for what now? A decade, give or take? They have a very specific design language for these.

        Plus, and I keep reminding people of this and they keep forgetting, they already made this feature once. It was on Windows 10, it was called Timeline, everybody turned it off and they never did much to change that, instead just adding a less intrusive offline version of it and ultimately removing it by the launch of 11 until… well, now.

        What I don’t understand is why you guys are so set on this specific list of grievances. You don’t need to dismiss the improvements they are making. They are improvements and they are a good thing.

        If you are set on rooting for or against OSs (and why would you, stop it, that’s weird) you can instead just point out that… well, the feature itself is still garbage. Even with a default opt out, even assuming it’s fully secure. It just covers no valid use case, unless you’re starring in Memento II. It remains a security vulnerability because social engineering and shared computers are a thing. It is exactly as dumb and useless as Timeline was, and there’s a reason nobody remembers that happened. The lack of AI search really, really isn’t why that failed.

        You don’t need to come across as a paranoid conspiracy theorist making up slippery slopes to keep criticising this about the things they are actually fixing. There are plenty of valid issues with it at a fundamental design level they are not changing. Being so wildly speculative about the eeeeevil corporate MS lying to us just makes the criticisms sound less valid when the actual thing they are doing is still pretty useless at best, and most likely really bad.

        • Ibuthyr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Look, I use Microsoft products. I have since PC-DOS became MS-DOS. You are plain wrong. Just look at the whole fiasco where MS is practically forcing users to tie their windows license to an account. It used to be easy to circumvent, nowadays it’s hidden like Waldo. They constantly do this shit. Stop shilling for corporations.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It is amazing to live in a world where pointing out that a feature is a trainwreck is “shilling for corporations”.

            That’s the part I just don’t get. Why you guys need people to be in denial or toeing a certain line, facts be damned. It’s not enough to be critical, people have to be critical at all times, of all things in the exact way everybody else is.

            The account crap is not a valid counterexample. Windows 11 (Home, at least) was always explicitly presented as requiring an account. The methods to install without it were always an usupported workaround. It does suck that they went the Apple path and traded up-front price for data mining, I would absolutely prefer the alternative on principle, even if I was already logging in on Win10 for work reasons. If there was a natively compatible Windows alternative without this requirement I’d default to that. My Windows installs have most of the related features disabled, where I can do that. I just recently got to a place where I can disable OneDrive now and I am incredibly happy about it, since we’re talking about it.

            But it’s not a slippery slope, it’s them gradually closing the unsupported loophole that was keeping some people from flipping out about it as it becomes clearer that vas majority of user are, in fact, logging in with a MS account.

            This is a datamining feature that is immediately unpopular and they are actively backtracking on it. There is clear precedent for this exact same functionality and it didn’t go that way. That’s not shilling, that’s just how reality worked last time this happened. Literally this. The same feature implemented in a very similar way.

            Again, there is plenty of legitimate stuff to complain about here. A lot of it is terrible even after the changes to opt-in and security. You don’t need to make up a fictional future scenario where they un-fix the stuff they are fixing. You can dislike the fixed version for actual, good reasons without having to sound like a weird online cultist.