• Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Necessary but not sufficient condition,” e.g. the light in your room might be off, but “suspending your light privileges” is easy at the breaker box.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No. You’re still not making it make sense.

        You’re trying to tell everyone that you can legally drive without a license.

        Of course you can drive without a license, but not legally. A learner’s permit is a type of license.

        So how do you suspend a license that the guy didn’t have?

        What is the breaker box in your analogy? Breaking the guy’s legs?

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          What is the breaker box in your analogy? Breaking legs?

          lol I meant a [circuit] breaker box (aka power/ac panel, breaker panel, distribution board, etc)

          So how do you suspend a license that the guy didn’t have?

          It’s just a minor legal misnomer. If a defendant happens to not have a driver’s license in the first place, suspension could be more accurately termed “prevention.” Logistically speaking, the state probably just generates a stub file/account with a valid license number then just adds the suspension to that empty driving record.

          • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh. Ok, I think I get it now… but it’s still weird.

            I’m not actually sure how that would work here… I do know that you can’t renew your license or plates without paying all overdue fines though.

          • skuzz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Since he already has a state ID, he already has an account. So they don’t even need to stub it.

    • skuzz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think, and I apologize in advance if I get this wrong, the part you may not be understanding is that it seems he never had a license to operate a vehicle. The state can still charge a person with suspending driving privileges legally, however, which would then likely stop their ability to apply for a license, and be a gateway to stack further charges in the event they were caught twice.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah we finally got that cleared up a little further down :)

        I actually don’t know what happens in that situation where I live.

        • skuzz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It is definitely a very American oddity, and possibly Michigan-specific as well, as each state’s laws can vary significantly. Like, Michigan let’s you know when your license is about to expire by mail. Colorado, by comparison, cares not one bit, and it is up to you to remember to renew. Colorado IDs are tied to your birthday, however, while MI is an arbitrary date at day of issue. We like to keep things so complicated in the US that nobody really ever knows what is going on. Probably by design or “freedom” or something.