• Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Buyback programs in the US are good for PR but do little to remove guns that would be used in a crime. Mostly people sell their junk and old rifles at these things. Many times, while they’re waiting in line they’ll get a better offer by the mob of people on the sidewalks looking to buy.

      Ammo restrictions, I agree would be effective. But the 2nd Amendment would shut that down.

      Documented firearms, again the cat is out of the bag. There are millions of undocumented firearms in the US. And no criminal would use one with a paper trail anyway. This just makes things harder for honest people.

      Those “proven” methods haven’t worked in the US. The 2nd Amendment and a very armed population will see to it that the guns are here to stay, by force if necessary.

      I’m not a defeatist, I’m a realist.

      • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Each of these ideas solves a different aspect of the bigger problem, but none of them will solve the entire issue.

        The problem is that with these ‘realistic’ views, we never make ANY progress by just throwing our hands up, saying ‘Well there are just too many guns to solve the problem with a single solution.’