• Apepollo11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    This. There is evidence that a preacher called Jesus existed, was crucified, and was well-regarded enough to start a following that persisted even after his death.

    There isn’t, however, strong historical evidence for any of the magical parts of it.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t think anyone is talking about the miracles when they refer to the historical Jesus.

      • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Every Christian takes an historical proof of Jesus as affirmation of the stories within the New Testament.

        • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Let’s not do the ‘every Christian’ thing. It’s worth remembering the US has a very ‘unique’ type of Christian.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I remember that one miracle closely resembles CPR. He put his hands on a body and brought it back to life.

      • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Primary sources? No, but there are independent secondary sources by people with no skin in the game.

        Antiquities of the Jews by Josephus (circa 93–94 CE).

        Annals by Tacitus (circa 116 CE)

        The earliest Christian writings are also more about the teachings of a disruptive Jewish preacher who was then crucified, than they are about magic.