• Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      vor 8 Monaten

      SCOTUS has routinely bent over backwards to protect politicians from corruption and bribery charges though so the message is clear. You cannot charge a politician with bribery except in extreme circumstances. Like them being a democrat.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      vor 8 Monaten

      “At every level” she’s making specific reference to a specific certain level in the US judicial system here… Some pretty good, brave activism three - good luck getting your mom a house from a billionaire now Justice Jackson

      • I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        vor 8 Monaten

        Your comment is nonsensical. Format that shit. And wtf, are you saying Judge Jackson is corrupt as well? You are making no sense.

        • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          vor 8 Monaten

          Their formatting was dog dukey, but I was still able to parse what they were saying fairly easily. They’re saying “good job judge Jackson. Too bad you won’t be able to get a free house from insert evil billionaire here (/s)”. While I agree with your sentiment, the way you go about pointing these things out can backfire, if done with a rude tone, such as the way you chose to do it. There you go; an unsolicited constructive criticism for an unsolicited constructive criticism. :)