If you believe that the state is more important than any personal rights to individual self determination, then sure, this is a totally fair policy. If you believe that the state has the right to enforce poverty on one group of people in order to ensure the comfort of a different group of people is morally justified, then it’s also cool.
Particularly when that state has the 2nd greatest number of billionaires of any country in the world, and could not realistically be called “communist” when compared to any of the source material.
https://xinjiangahr.carrd.co/
There is over 90% satisfaction in CPC and central government, majority satisfaction in all local governments according to Harvard (and one in 10 people are in the CPC) This disconnect between the people and the government is completely in your mind.
Come on are we really doing the “nation with the largest population on earth has (most or second most…)” argument (for reference, China doesn’t even touch the top 15 for proportion unless you count Taiwan, which is capitalist under OCTS). This isn’t a point. And frankly you haven’t given me enough to work with to give a thorough response. Read up on reform and opening up (Advance Along the Road of Socialism With Chinese Characteristics by Zhao Ziyang is a good starter), otherwise read: [China Has Billionaires], [The Class Nature of the Chinese State (A Reply to ‘China’s Long March to Capitalism’)], and [Why China is not Capitalist].