• Junkernaught@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      This sounds fine, I’ve no problem emitting telemetry as long as it is 100% anonymous and can’t be traced to individuals

      • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well I do have a problem with that. Since we don’t see eye to eye, dont you agree then that it should have been opt in instead of a hidden opt out?

        • Jako301@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Let’s be honest, opt in telemetry features will collect so little data they might es well not exist.

          Considering that ot is supposed to reduce user tracking by tracking ads directly, it’s a net gain for everyone.

      • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Same, although I have lingering paranoia that any data recorded by this might be traced back to me by making inferences when combined with other data; however, unlike the OOP, I will say I don’t really know what I’m talking about.

    • smpl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Did you ironically preserve the utm_source parameter?