I recently saw a comment chain about nuclear bombs, and that led me to thinking about this. Say there is a nuclear explosion in the downtown of my US city. I survive relatively fine, but obviously the main part of the city has been destroyed, while major zones extending from the center were also badly damaged. What would be a good response to (a) survive and (b) help out the recovery effort?

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Is there even any nukeing the airport? Damage to the runway plus the EMP generated would probably prevent aircraft from taking off.

    • skillissuer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      turns out that flat strips of concrete firmly attached to ground are pretty hard to damage

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I just assumed they would want to hit major infrastructure like airports, depots and such. Now my new fear is they don’t nuke the airport at all. Im like at 3rd degree awefulness distance.

      • skillissuer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        airstrips longer than 1600m (iirc) were at some point designated as strategic targets by soviets, so you assumed correctly