cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/889819

The EU General Court in Luxembourg ruled that the designation was warranted under the European Union’s new Digital Markets Act (DMA) because short video app TikTok exceeded relevant thresholds including global market value and the number of EU users.

Labeled companies are prevented from forcing users in the bloc to consent to have access to a service or certain functionalities.

ByteDance had argued that its global market value largely came from China, rather than the EU.

It also said TikTok does not operate an exponential user expansion model and that it was acting as a “challenger” to digital monopolies operated by established platforms such as Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, and Alphabet, which owns Google. Both companies are also designated as “gatekeepers.”

But the EU General Court rejected those arguments, finding that TikTok could no longer be considered a “challenger” on the market, unlike when it joined back in 2018.

The judges concluded that TikTok had “succeeded in increasing its number of users very rapidly and exponentially” since then, and that its large number of European users does indeed contribute to its global market value.

  • twei
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes, we just can’t stop getting W’s

    Like the time the EU Commission tried to circumvent E2EE but failed

    Or the other time our EU Commission tried to circumvent E2EE but failed

    Or the other time… why the fuck are they trying this like every 2 weeks? They’re currently working on a new proposal but just recently stopped paused because they estimated that it wouldn’t pass the parliament

    • unexposedhazard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah there are plenty of things to criticize about the EU but at least they are mostly open about their attempts at undermining democracy.