• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Source on all your statistics and values.

    Average rent 1940 $27 per month

    https://ipropertymanagement.com/research/average-rent-by-year

    Food costs

    https://www.thepeoplehistory.com/40sfood.html

    Meat $6 per month (1/2 lb per day) Eggs $1 per month (2 dozen) Bread $0.40 per month (3 loafs) Fruits $2 per month (1/2 lb per day) Vegitables $2 per month (1/2 lb per day) Milk $1.50 per month (2 gallons) Cereal $0.35 per month (2 boxes) Flour $0.05 per month (1 lb)

    Total $13.30

    You seem to think people had zero money when that was implemented.

    Where did I state that?

    Minimum wage covers nothing. Rent on a house is over the amount minimum wage pays.

    Never made the claim that it was.

    You said “minimum wage was never intended to be a living wage”

    I said “never INTENDED - factually false”. He absolutely intended it.

    Do not judge a bill based on what a politician says judge it on what it actually does. At the inception of the minimum wage it was below a living wage.

    You now saying all that other stuff is irrelevant, moving of the goal posts.

    I’m judging minimum wage based on results not the propaganda spewed out of a politicians upper oriface.

        • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sources are great.

          Read the rest of my post. Learn what the word “intended” means. Understand how “intended” doesn’t mean successfully implemented. Understand that by stating “it wasn’t intended” is false.

          Is english your first language? I can simplify it for you if the language is a challenge

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Only a fool determines intent based solely on what someone says, espically a politician. Blindly believing that FDR intended minimum wage to be a living wage because he said so but somehow couldn’t get a living wage passed is impressively naive. The National Industrial Recovery Act passed the House 329-80 & senate 60-26, he had the votes for 0.35 per hour but didn’t do it.

              • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Are you debating what you believe you can read from someones mind?

                Yeah, we both are. Your argument is that FDR said it so it must be true, mine is what he did contradicts what he said.

                Remember the old adage actions speak louder than words. FDR had the support to implement a living wage but implemented minimum wage instead.

                • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  And back to the start we go.

                  You said “minimum wage wasn’t intended to be a living wage”. FDR in his speech specifically stated it was intended.

                  Your statement was factually false.

                  “Minimum wage was intended to be a living wage but FDR and the american government failed to achieve this”. I agree. It didn’t become a living wage.

                  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    FDR stating something does not make it true. Do you have any tangible evidence that FDR pushed for a living wage?