Biden delivered remarks from the Oval Office outlining his decision not to seek reelection, his first on-camera remarks since making that announcement on Sunday. In addition to explaining why he is ending his candidacy, he listed off his priorities for his remaining time as president.

“And I’m going to call for Supreme Court reform, because this is critical to our democracy,” Biden said.

Multiple outlets have reported that Biden is considering proposals to establish term limits for Supreme Court justices and an enforceable ethics code for those on the high court.

  • ignirtoq@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ironically if he did that and appointed new liberal justices, there’s a good chance the new Court would overturn this Court’s decision, and he could be convicted of murder and probably violating several other federal laws for that act.

      • ignirtoq@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        89
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ex post facto is for if a new law is passed making something a crime, and the act was committed before its passage. This is all about interpretation of already passed law. It’s basically the justices saying that this was against the law the whole time. Ex post facto doesn’t apply here.

        • nilloc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Kamala could pardon him. I don’t think very many of their voters would mind.

      • Sabata@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The president is currently above the law, so the constitution is as good as toilet paper.

      • ignirtoq@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        No laws have been changed. Court decisions are not considered the passage of a law, so ex post facto doesn’t apply. Changes to how laws are interpreted don’t factor into ex post facto considerations.