• Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nah, I think it could be done if billionaires didn’t hoard all the wealth. The wealth of some of these people is enough to live confortably for several lifetimes.

      • nilloc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Even at 10 million dollars for a lifetime (which is way more than I’ll make in a lifetime) 1 billion is 100 lifetimes’ worth.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      The only reason there’s “not enough resources” is because someone is always trying to make money off them. There’s plenty of resources, their distribution just won’t make anyone rich if we share and share alike.

      • nilloc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        And the pandemic showed that when people value their lives and time properly, minimal wages aren’t enough, which is why the supply of restaurant, hotel and grocery workers was so low. The ceos blamed $1000 checks though while keeping wages lower that needed and raking in profits.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem with ending world hunger is, food abundance allows for more people. If you want to end world hunger, you need to start with healthcare and contraceptives and education, which is more expensive and less “flashy” than just saying “I bought a lifetime supply of rice for poor people in X area”.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The problem with ending world hunger is, food abundance allows for more people.

          That is a garbage take… as is all right-wing “overpopulation” bullshittery.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Ελληνικά
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s not, there is some nuance here.

            The right-wing take is that we should use this potential crisis to lockdown borders, deny aid to others, and have it as an excuse why you don’t have to do anything to fight climate change, becuase people in (pick whatever the current scary country is) are breeding out of control, and coming here and ruining things for us.

            The left wing take is to promote healthcare, education, and contraceptive use, while providing aid, making those benefits available to everyone, and empowering yourself and others to act.

            The facts about population dynamics is not a right or left wing thing. What you think is the solution to the situation is.

            • masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s not, there is some nuance here.

              Not really. The problem is fundamentally not one of population, but one of consumption. Specifically, the consumption of a small minority of rich people and the capitalist mode of production that keeps them rich. There may be no such thing as “overpopulation,” but there is most definitely such a thing as overconsumption.

              The last time I checked, it would take the resources of four earths if everyone on the planet consumed resources at the rate the average USian does, and keep in mind that this metric - average US consumption - is heavily skewed by the batshit insane consumption of the priveleged classes in the US.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                Ελληνικά
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Ah yes, the US is the reason why other countries can’t grow enough food.

                Yes there is nuance here. It’s idiotic to think that the interaction between population density, climate change, agricultural technology, supply line disruptions, international relationships and literally everything else, impacting the ability to provide food in a specific location on the planet is a black and white issue.

                Shit, I should of realized it was you. The naive dogshit logic should have tipped me off.

                • masquenox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Buy into right-wing fairy tales and apologetics all you want… it’s only a matter of time before they come crashing down, just like the lies about your fetishized little white supremacist “heavenly kingdom” there in the middle-east came crashing down recently.

                  And there’s not much you can do to stop it, apologist.