• lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Nah. More hazard pay, more security, lobby for carte blanche against eco-terrorists.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      …which increases the cost of doing business for those companies.

      And if eco-terrorists are successfully killing their directors, then they are probably also setting fire to their offices, mailing poison to managers, sending death threats and hate mail to employees, vandalising company property, calling in bomb threats to their refineries, executing those threats…

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The benefits outweigh the costs. Openly employing private armies with full government support, randomly arresting suspected eco-terrorists and their families, holding them indefinitely at undisclosed locations, raiding or UAV bombing reported gathering locations etc.

        Think of all the fun to be had!