• nocages [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Am I reading something different than everyone else here? Because I completely understand what she’s trying to get at.

    Leftists are dismissing the song because its early interest was astroturfed. This is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, because it has actual interest among people now, because of the astroturfing. How do we combat this problem? Just because we dismiss the song as astroturfed right-wing propaganda doesn’t mean the listeners are. The right is changing minds with content like this, and it’s problematic for us.

    “It can’t be viral because it was astroturfed” isn’t a helpful assessment, because the song absolutely is viral now. It even came up in my feed on a music community. I clicked it because it looked like it would be up my alley based on the title and thumbnail (I enjoy folk music that shits on capitalists) and I only realized it was that song once I got to the line about people “milking welfare.” The astroturfing may have raised the song up the hill, but at a certain point it had enough views and such to carry it based on momentum.

    What I think the author is trying to say is that the right is succeeding here, and largely leftist media fails to make the same impact. Probably because we don’t have the same connections that allow astroturfing that the people who pushed this song do. But that does leave a meaningful question: how do we reverse this trend and get people interested in leftist topics through arts and culture? How do we promote the material we have already created?

    Edit: Oh no, I just heard it on the radio.

    • MerryChristmas [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m with you. Sometimes it seems like we’re content to sit back and be proven right by the failures of capitalism, but if we want to actually build anything that lasts then we need to engage instead of sticking to our insular pockets. I do think federation has been a step in the right direction for that reason.

  • Othello [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    she thinks that people like the song despite the bigotry, when they obviously like it because of the bigotry. this isnt even a far right song, its an average conservative song. there are millions of conservatives in usamerica its moronic to think that the left needs a “response” to a regular ass racist song. if anything all the usamerican left cares about is propaganda.

  • GenXen [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Roger Waters has faces more backlash for simply opening his mouth on any given day of the week for the last forty five years than this fella has over the last week. It’s illegitimate to pretend like there hasn’t been a organized and concerted effort by elites controlling all forms of popular media to quell the left’s point of view for over 50 years. Where’s the lefty viral artists?

    Pawn Stars Rick: “Best I can do is a Grimes.”

  • LeBron [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get what she’s trying to say, as goofy as this hog song is, it did it’s job and people are eating it up. The left will never reach the masses with pro working class art, that stuff is going triple tinfoil and reaching nobody when you compare the numbers.

  • Walk_On [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    She later deleted it saying:

    Gonna delete my “Rich Men North of Richmond” thread because too many people are mistaking it for an argument in defense of the song, which it isn’t. My fault for not communicating better. I’ll probably write an article fleshing out my thoughts later on.

    Sure, Caitlin, we misunderstood what you were trying to say lol

    • RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think she’s simply trying to say “fuck, we need a viral 2023 lefty song”.

      Of course that shit might be boosted by the someone “tilting” the youtube algorithms, but also, a lot of people is reactionary. The virality of that shit might be “genuine”.

      • TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s concerning that astroturfed or not, two conservative/fash songs in quick succession seem (emphasis on the seem) to have had a way bigger impact outside of its usual base than any left wing music on the same people in the past 5 years. We can talk about how the working class of the imperial core can at best only be social chauvinist, and most of the time actively fash to justify it, and how the US is an actively fascist culture, but the observable effect is that two country songs with an openly bigoted and hateful message got big in the past month or two, and that requires some self-crit and reflection on what the left is doing in terms of mass art for the working class.

        • nocages [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like we need to make an effort to understand what people are trying to say and not shame them for communicating their ideas in a way that we don’t understand. To do the latter can be unintentionally ableist.

        • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that’s the curse of substack subsistence writer. Every online thing happening (in their sphere) must have a take for it and every take just be long winded and try to cram in a unique perspective as an advert for what you get if you subscribe, regardless of whether those things are warranted.

      • A bit of this, and I think she’s asking the question: why does the left not have viral songs that capture the imagination of the working class, too? I think she’s saying that astroturfing or not, the song has taken a hold in popular culture and that the left needs to get a move on rather than just point at past successes.

  • HarryLime [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Caitlin Johnstone is good. She gets a little excited in her posts and tweets sometimes, but whom amongst us hasn’t?

    • Walk_On [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nah, she really isn’t. Aside from that she was spreading Pizzagate conspiracy nonsense as well as anti-lockdown/anti-vaccine mandate statements.

        • Walk_On [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          650,000 people die of the flu every year. Do you support governments forcing everyone to take a flu vaccine, and if not why are you an evil anti-vaxxer who wants to murder 650,000 people a year?

          My point of course is not that Covid is the flu, it’s that everyone who supports vaccine mandates has a line at which they believe they not be justified. It just happens that I and many others do not believe Covid is the line where such measures are just.

          It’s not that vaccine mandates are never justifiable under any circumstances; a sufficiently deadly virus with a sufficiently excellent vaccine could make a solid case that such intrusive measures are necessary. It’s that this particular virus and vaccines don’t make such a case.

          Three statements about mandates from her. As far I as I could tell, she hasn’t said anything about lockdowns being bad, so I misremembered.

          • HarryLime [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I was wrong. I remembered her saying something a few years ago about how much money she could make saying covid was fake and the lockdowns and vaccines were a Bill Gates plot and she wasn’t going to go there, but she did jump into skepticism without going whole hog.

      • nocages [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a song that lures in discontented working class types with lyrics that court their hatred of their bosses and rich people who flaunt their wealth, but it also promotes right-wing talking points like “welfare queens.” It’s being talked about here because it has become very popular on social media recently. You do not have to listen to the song, it is not very good.

  • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because she does say many things that are correct and worthy of taking seriously

    Think about all the incorrect/weird shit that all the acclaimed and celebrated Marxist philosophers wrote/said

  • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/08/oliver-anthony-and-the-incoherence-of-right-wing-populism.html

    But the notion that Anthony’s viral success owes nothing to his song and everything to the machinations of conservative apparatchiks is a bit odd. I have no insight into whether Anthony organically came onto the radar of right-wing commentators, who then used their clout to promote him, or was somehow recruited for a meticulously planned propaganda operation. Regardless, it is not as though Matt Walsh has the power to mint chart-topping country songs at will. If he did, he’d be in a different and more lucrative line of work. The music industry is perpetually trying to “Astroturf” hits through concerted and expensive promotional campaigns. It does not always work. Anthony’s song would not have gone viral if it lacked genuine appeal.