“Not really fair to nazis (cites BBOC)” jesus christ and that’s still up while the person who said nazis/sympathizers should be shot has their comment removed. Scratched liberals show where their preference is in “both are bad” the second is the USSR is defended.

    • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 year ago

      Drought plus kulaks burning food out of spite, where more Russians died than Ukrainians? Genocide.

      Blight of a single crop plus a continued net export of food, where only Irish died? Not a genocide.

    • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least they’re not as bad as “The English and their History” (which I picked up on a whim) where the author not only denies that it was a genocide, but also praises the English for breaking records in money collected for disaster relief. But what got me to go from morbid curiosity about imperial apologia to stopping reading was when we got to the 20th century and you’d believe that the UK single handedly won both world wars and the evil populace rewarded these noble men by electing the evil socialists. But luckily that was corrected when Thatcher came in and set everything right.

      It wasn’t apparent that Robert Tombs was a tory hack until late early modern period, but then it goes off the rails.

    • pooh [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was browsing a thread this morning on the topic of Hexbear and a lot of them seems genuinely cool and have a pro-federate-with-hexbear stance. There’s definitely some reactionaries over there, but there appear to be some cool folks as well.

      EDIT: To add to this, I think we should absolutely target reactionaries anywhere (of course), but we SHOULD NOT let it turn into a war against other whole lemmy instances. There are cool people on most of these instances, and we should support them in their struggle to cleanse nazi filth from their own corner of the lemmyverse.

  • Why would the Lenin and the USSR topple the Czar when he was just two days away from inventing an immortality serum that would have prevented every starvation, death of old age, and death against the Nazis. So the Soviet Union is responsible for all those deaths.

      • daisy@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        1 year ago

        And there were no other famines in any other parts of the world when the holographymordor was happening. None at all.

  • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    wanting the workers to control the means of production is even worse than doing the holocaust! Why? Because a reactionary wrote a book full of lies. Checkmate. smuglord

  • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is severely understating the number of deaths nazis caused. I wonder why the user would do this.

    Also, why would he use a source for communist deaths written by fascists, at least one of which was so fascist and disingenuous about his aims the project got disavowed by the other authors?

  • GnastyGnuts [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Treating morality as a math problem is so stupid. Did you know that Audie Murphy killed more people than the Golden State Killer, the Zodiac Killer, and the BTK Killer combined? Therefore he was mathematically more evil than all three of those serial killers combined I guess, reasons and the nature of the victims be damned.

    Also these people never want to scale for time or number of participants: the Nazis were around for a measly ~12 years, while the USSR was around for ~69 years hentai-free, and Nazi Germany was one nation while “the communists” during the Cold War consisted of several nations.

    Treating the Black Book numbers as though they’re reliable (they aren’t) for the sake of argument:

    Nazis: 17 million divided across 12 years is ~1,416,666 per year average deaths, from one nation / political project.

    The Communists: 100 million across 69 years is ~1,449,275 per year average deaths, from multiple nations / political projects.

    The Nazis weren’t going to stop themselves, they had to be stopped by the USSR. If they had lasted as long as the USSR, they would have comparable kill-counts to what the extremely unreliable Black Book of Communism attributes to the Communists. If you added in the kills from the other fascist nations (Imperial Japan in particular) instead of deliberately skewing the comparison by having all of communism throughout the Cold War against only the Nazis, then the fascists far outpace the communists, even by bullshit Black Book numbers.

    • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also the nazi number is a low ball if you count missing civilians, there were something like 20 million missing Soviet citizens, presumed dead

      • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        even if you ignore missing civilians it’s a lowball, the european theater of world war 2 was like 30-40 million deaths. I don’t see any good reason 100% of those deaths shouldn’t be billed to the nazis.

        • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          If we’d use the logic of the black book, we’d have to do exactly that, as it counts all the Wehrmacht soldiers killed by the Red Army and the communist partisans in self defense as “victims of communism”. Can’t have anti-commuinism without clean Wehrmacht propaganda after all.

          Not to mention that the nazis did almost all of that killing in a mere fraction of the 12 years they were in power. The deportations only picked up speed when the war was already underway. And it’s not as if they were anywhere near being done with the atrocities they had dreamt up for Eastern Europe when they were finally stopped. If the Nazis would’ve ever had controlled an area as large as the AES states combined, for as long as the USSR existed, the death count would be immeasurable.

          Saying the communists were worse than the nazis is full-blown Hitler apologia and should always be treated as such.

          • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s Black Book of Communism to be clear, not The Black Book of Soviet Jewry, Polish Jewry, and Poland that that title is taken from which are documents of the Holocaust carried out during and shortly after the war

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Treating morality as a math problem is so stupid. Did you know that Audie Murphy killed more people than the Golden State Killer, the Zodiac Killer, and the BTK Killer combined? Therefore he was mathematically more evil than all three of those serial killers combined I guess, reasons and the nature of the victims be damned.

      Excellent point