Riddick3001@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWHO’s first traditional medicine summit splits opinionswww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down13cross-posted to: publichealth@mander.xyz
arrow-up150arrow-down1external-linkWHO’s first traditional medicine summit splits opinionswww.nature.comRiddick3001@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square15fedilinkcross-posted to: publichealth@mander.xyz
minus-squareCleverdawny@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down3·1 year agoYes. It’s controversial when an international body purporting to represent science and medical progress for the world endorses sham medicine and quackery. That’s controversial. And it should be. It would be like a green energy summit featuring coal companies as speakers.
Yes.
It’s controversial when an international body purporting to represent science and medical progress for the world endorses sham medicine and quackery.
That’s controversial. And it should be. It would be like a green energy summit featuring coal companies as speakers.