Talking to literal children for political analysis.
Meh, personally not my cup of tea. Already have am instinctual understanding of the subject matter at hand. The concept of community and forming your beliefs around that community is not a revolutionary line of thinking.
I don’t care for em either. I just know about them.
deleted by creator
I guess there’s room for me to be more terminally online, because I have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about.
Sorry, it was a little off topic so I deleted it right after commenting. But I was referencing Dean Browning, the guy who was caught doing what some call ‘digital-brown-face’: https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2020/11/10/21559458/dean-browning-dan-purdy-byl-holte-patti-labelle-twitter-gay-black-man
16 year old anarcho-capitalist
Escape while you can
getting someone to listen to this conversation would be a violation of the geneva convention
Nobody is anything at age 13 and probably not at age 17 this isn’t a journey you’re children.
I think this more or less the thesis of their work. And how infantile these make work online ideology shop is like. The work is a wider look on people who are engaged with such stuff and how they turn out.
The political compass was a huge mistake.
I genuinely think most podcasts patreons are being kept afloat by people who lost track of all the things they’re subscribed to.
The guests who aren’t children have child-like ideology lmao
I think I know who this is. Its citarella from donotresearch. He does like over arching analysis on like online sphere of politics. I don’t care for these episodes. But I have read their stuff. Its fine.
I do find some of their positions kind of disagreeable at times.
