• dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure

        • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who tf wants usability when shit just has a solution no matter what. Additionally its an old program that a normal person wouldn’t even try.

          On windows shit just doesn’t work and the solutions are most of the time not even existing.

        • riskable@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re trying to get ancient software to work I think “user friendliness” is the least of your concerns. Especially compared to the alternative (Windows) where the answer is just, “No: That’s not going to work no matter what you do.”