• MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    3 months ago

    These stories have been rolling out my entire life and we still have nothing but a sea of plastics polluting the word. I call bullshit.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think they just left out “…in the lab.”

      The research is great, the article is horrible in many ways; it was obviously written by someone who didn’t understand what they were writing about.

      Even leading with a high power laser array image when the article is about heating plastic with a low power non-visible radiation….

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s always “in mice” or on an extremely small scale for ridiculous prices.

      Scientists only develop the first stepping stones, most of which lead to nothing, that’s okay. But the university PR > newspaper pipeline leads to everything being a major breakthrough, and that leads to fatigue with the reader.

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      The biggest hurdle with getting widespread adoption of any scientific breakthrough is cost. If something is not more profitable than the current way of doing things it will not be adopted. Destroying our planet is pretty damn profitable, so until we exterminate capitalism I don’t see anything changing.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    How about just find a way to properly dispose of it and move on to something better / more reusable? Plastics are bad on several levels, the most horrifying in recent memory being micro plastics literally invading every part of our bodies.

    • ColeSloth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Some stuff can’t really be made very well without plastic. It can vastly be cut down, for certain. But it isn’t yet realistic to eliminate yet. We need replacement materials and ways to eliminate what is already here.

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Right. But we need to at least hold companies accountable and get them moving in the right direction. Currently they don’t give a shit. Single use plastics are ridiculous right now, at least in the US. Unnecessary and can easily be replaced or simply not used.

        • ColeSloth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          We live in an oligarchy. As long as plastic is cheaper and gets sales, it will keep being used unless a law bans it. I lived in a time when soda was canned or in glass bottles. The stuff tasted better bottled in glass. Plastic was lighter and cheaper, so it got switched.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is a pretty good way: burn it.

        Most plastics can’t be recycled in any meaningful way, so just burn it and use the energy. There are some legitimate uses for plastics, but most of it is wasted.

        And always remember: most of the plastic in the ocean is fishing gear, not household waste.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve been kind of hoping with just use renewables to do pyrolysis on waste plastic and turn it back into oil. It’s extremely power hungry to do it but we’ve got power to spare.