🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.works to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 11 months agoNah, not worth the troublesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageNah, not worth the troublesh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.works to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squareGlitchington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·11 months agoNo, it’s just ensuring SSL encryption to their servers at all times. It’s the best possible look for a website called privacy.com. If they allowed http connections, those connections aren’t guaranteed to be private (encrypted).
minus-squarelemmyvore@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoI’m talking about leaving http://privacy.com (the non-secured version) not leading anywhere. It’s an amateur move.
minus-squareSokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoRight. I don’t feel like trusting my CC information to a company that doesn’t even know how to do a redirect.
No, it’s just ensuring SSL encryption to their servers at all times. It’s the best possible look for a website called privacy.com. If they allowed http connections, those connections aren’t guaranteed to be private (encrypted).
I’m talking about leaving http://privacy.com (the non-secured version) not leading anywhere. It’s an amateur move.
Right. I don’t feel like trusting my CC information to a company that doesn’t even know how to do a redirect.