• qaz@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This graph doesn’t make sense. How can you even more reach the bottom part?

    EDIT: This is what I mean

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 years ago

      I see your edit so I wanted to come back and explain again that woke isn’t an endpoint, it’s an end-loop. In the graph all things considered WOKE will continuously be checked again until it reaches Not Woke (if ever).

    • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      once something is determined woke by the grift, it can only be the focus as long as it is the right level of popular for anyone to listen to the scam. something to beloved or obscure won’t achieve the desired outrage

    • OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I actually found that part clever. Things do actually get declared “woke” and then become popular enough that the grifters declare it unwoke.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Have Minorities, Don’t Sexualize them, and then you automatically move into the recurring loop.