I get that it started for free with less intrusive ads, but YouTube has had a huge impact on the way we all share and consume information. Understanding how much money it takes to run a service with the technology needed to provide high definition videos on a site that is up 99.9999999% of the time, I have no issue paying for a service that has changed my life in many positive ways. Now I do hate price gouging like everyone else, but it’s inescapable from gas & groceries to all streaming platforms.

  • Eww@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not bootlicking, I just recognize the value their platform adds. Do I wish there were a better alternative? Absolutely, but I have not done the work to figure that out and am able to pay without issue. I have been working on Tech for nearly 2 decades, so I am acutely aware of who I am dealing with.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      recognize the value their platform adds

      You are shilling for a bad faith actor who is also the enemy of the people…

      I doubt Google would ever give you the same decency.

      • Eww@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        If I’m shilling for anyone, it’s the content creators. The platform wouldn’t be what it is without them. I don’t consume YouTube, I consume the videos it makes available which is a big distinction.

        • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          If this was true, you’d use an ad blocker, and donate directly to your favorite content creators. They’d see way more money, and you wouldn’t be supporting an evil organization.

          They’d have more freedom to switch platforms as their revenue isn’t directly tied to youtube, but rather their viewers. Freedom to switch platforms gives youtube incentive to run a better site and charge a more reasonable fee for premium features.

          But this isn’t what you’re doing. You’re supporting youtube directly and supporting all their business practices in the process

          • Eww@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I have been looking at trying to support all the creators I watch on their Patreon pages, but I can’t pay that much to follow everyone.

            I am aware that I’m not just paying for Premium features, but helping them keep the lights on. The cost for data centers, storage, and workers to keep it running comes from my contribution, so to say I’m just paying for features is inaccurate. The fact they still pay their creators after all that is good, but I agree they could do better.

            All in all, I do feel there is a tipping point approaching where I will abandon Google which I am actively working on by setting up a personal cloud on my own server.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Google is a shite middle man for that tho

          Big guys get most of the loot, smaller guys change and theybare the ones who need to be properly supoorted.

          Mr beats types can eat a dick and stick a feastible in his anus too!

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Here’s a nuanced take that agrees with the bad actor assessment of yours:

        -Wiki

        On average, I think something that has an unprecedented social impact probably adds recognizable value.