• o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Ya gotta imagine that TSMC execs are going to have a “hard-nosed realist” vibe compared to the average Silicon Valley tech guy.

  • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    Altman used his multi-stop trip to pitch his plans to progress AI, involving Asia’s manufacturing muscle, Middle Eastern money, and U.S. regulators.

    Slave labour, oil money and regulatory capture come together to form… whatever the fuck this is.

    This really seems like a bad joke. They are setting the world on fire for slightly better chatbots.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      You mean when the board of directors wanted to fire him? Considering the recent news of OpenAI transitioning towards for profit i think they got what they wanted from keeping him in charge. Seems like something Microsoft would benefit from and if they’d have gotten a different CEO at the time who knows if it had come to this point.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        How do you profit of a company that hemorrhages a few billion a year?

        Even Amazon had AWS, which was the absurdly profitable core business at the center of a cost bleeding distribution center.

        OpenAI is doing nothing to generate economic value.

        • golli@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          How do you profit of a company that hemorrhages a few billion a year?

          While it runs a deficit you don’t or at least only through increased valuations, which ofc assume that you’ll eventually be able to turn a profit. Will this ever happen for OpenAI, i have no idea, but that is the bet. And for the likes of Microsoft spending a few billions on bets like this isn’t that big of a deal, just look at how much Meta burns in their VR department.

          Even Amazon had AWS, which was the absurdly profitable core business at the center of a cost bleeding distribution center.

          Uber was running a deficit for a long time until it turned profitable. It’s pretty normal for many new companies to burn money first before they turn a profit. The biggest cost seems to be training new models constantly, and i assume one hope is that eventually this slows down. Then they need to get operating costs down that where i think they currently roughly break even (?) or maybe run a minor loss, but that seems doable, considering the pace at which hardware is still improving.

          OpenAI is doing nothing to generate economic value.

          I wouldn’t say that it is nothing, but at this very moment it probably doesn’t equal the immense amount of resources poured into it. That said, if things improve both in terms of the quality of responses you can get from models as well as reduced costs to run them, then there is definitely huge economic potential.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Will this ever happen for OpenAI, i have no idea, but that is the bet.

            More than a bet. It’s an engineered outcome, as Microsoft tries to force people into their AI walled garden.

            Only question is how many people go along for the ride.

            Uber was running a deficit for a long time until it turned profitable.

            Uber is a great example of negative externalities, as the average Uber driver doesn’t earn money once you depreciate the value of the car being used.

            That said, if things improve both in terms of the quality of responses you can get from models as well as reduced costs to run them, then there is definitely huge economic potential.

            The line I’ve seen on AI boils down to this. AI won’t meet human economic potential. But it will run cheaper, which means paper growth, which means the investment is “worth it” at an industry level.

            But at a macro level? Economy wide? Big Number may go up, but real productivity is going to slide the more AI attempts to replace human labor.

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The alternative was ceding it to the people that are True Belivers iirc? Say what you will about Sammy boi, I’m pretty sure at least he doesn’t fucking believe in the lies he says, something that cannot be said about Ilya or some other (former) high profile people there.

        • istewart@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Point well made. Engineers, however quantitative they may be, are not often finance people. If the true believers were left in charge, they’d probably bankrupt promises much more rapidly, and auger the whole enterprise into the ground that much quicker. I can’t see that Altman is actually that great a finance guy either, at least in stewardship of other people’s money, but he has cultivated the ability to manipulate cash out of people and institutions during this grift-dominant era of Silicon Valley.