Credit Andy Singer 2024

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Or and this is nuts, but the Ottoman Empire was building up the area and urbanization was happening. Nobody got replaced, it was just more people moving in.

    • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      those are synonyms, or are we all pretending gentrification doesn’t exist again?

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            No. Not exactly. The Israelis have spent decades pushing Palestinians out. They aren’t just moving in.

            • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              i’m not arguing against that, I just don’t buy that Palestinians are natives. Ottomans in the region were subject to mass migration following the British mandate.

              • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                So you’re arguing what exactly?

                That since they both came in an oppressed the local Arabs of the 1830s (who are in no way ever included in the definition of Palestian?) and took their land that but migration continued so the Israeli pushing of Palestinians off of the land is just a continuation of what both sides did to the definitely never Palestinian Arabs who were there earlier and so it isn’t wrong?