hahattpro@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 2 days agoUS couple blocked from suing Uber after crash say daughter agreed to Uber Eats termswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1777arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: politics@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1773arrow-down1external-linkUS couple blocked from suing Uber after crash say daughter agreed to Uber Eats termswww.theguardian.comhahattpro@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square95fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: politics@sh.itjust.works
This case is quite similar with Disney+ case. You press ‘Agree’, you lost the right to sue the company.
minus-squareGeneralEmergency@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·3 hours ago So disney has no control or agency over any of its restraunts This wasn’t one of Disney’s restaurants though. They owned the land it was on but had no say over management.
minus-squareMalek061@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 hour agoThere is no way the disney brand would allow complete control over a sub contractor. Disney has final say in anything inside those gates.
minus-squareGeneralEmergency@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 minutes agoNice to see you admitting you’re making up bullshit to support your delusions
minus-squareMalek061@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 minutes agoWhat bullshit? Disney, has an image to protect and they absolutely exert control over their sub contractor vendors.
This wasn’t one of Disney’s restaurants though. They owned the land it was on but had no say over management.
There is no way the disney brand would allow complete control over a sub contractor. Disney has final say in anything inside those gates.
Nice to see you admitting you’re making up bullshit to support your delusions
What bullshit? Disney, has an image to protect and they absolutely exert control over their sub contractor vendors.