• yetiftw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    absolute scales are still arbitrary. you would probably want to use a scale that measures “perceived heat” which is different than average kinetic energy

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Kelvin is just our word for it, but that is the point of “no heat”. It isn’t arbitrary, there is no “negative kelvin” just like you cannot make something colder than absolute zero.

      So if you take the difference between “coldest possible temp” and “average summer temp”, then slice it in half, you’re getting temperatures that would kill most life on earth.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Just to nitpick, there are negative kelvins. I don’t really understand it, myself, but I know it exists due to the specifics of how temperature is defined. Negative kelvins are actually extremely hot.

      • yetiftw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        just because it has a reason doesn’t make it not arbitrary. you can ultimately come up with a reason for all arbitrary decisions