A man who attempted to vote twice in Virginia's 2023 election was acquitted of attempted illegal voting on Monday, following his claims in court that he had been testing the the system for voter fraud.

A man who attempted to vote twice in Virginia’s 2023 election was acquitted of attempted illegal voting on Monday, following his claims in court that he had been testing the system for voter fraud.

A Nelson County jury found 67-year-old Richardson Carter Bell Jr. not guilty of attempting to vote more than once in the same election. According to the Washington Post, Bell, a staunch supporter of former President Donald Trump, admitted voting early at his local registrar’s office only to also show up at a nearby polling place on Election Day.

  • notsure@fedia.io
    27·
    12 hours ago

    What happens if, and I use a strong IF, a democrat did this? Oh, yeah, honest mistakes aren’t allowed, but blatant flouting of laws is? do I need to put the /s?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
      14·
      12 hours ago

      It was a jury trial and the county went 51% trump four years ago…

      So depends on what the jury makeup is.

      • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
        9·
        12 hours ago

        From the linked washingtonpost article though ( https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/10/29/gop-voter-virginia-vote-twice/ : https://archive.is/U7AoW#selection-755.0-755.327 ), it sounds like the defense had a very good argument.

        Defense attorney Matthew L. Pack contended that Bell would not have gone through with voting more than once in the same election — a felony punishable by one to five years in prison — if poll workers had actually handed him a ballot.

        But he never got the chance to demonstrate that because

        As it happened, the workers quickly discovered that he had already voted and turned him away.

        Speaking neutrally, it’s good that we have a system in place that requires a high level of evidence - such as regarding intent - before finding someone guilty. I’d just hope that it equally protects folks regardless of if they are blue or red.

          • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
            4·
            11 hours ago

            Oh, agreed. Should have a way to punish someone for trying (e.g. attempted murder charges because the police stopped the murder and saved the intended victim). But even then, one still has to be able to prove it, and the level of proof - beyond a reasonable doubt - is as high as it is for good reason.

            Now, if the accused had encountered police detectives at that polling station instead of real election workers, I imagine it would have gone like this:

            (Police detective posing as a poll worker prepares an otherwise blank but non-obviously spoiled ballot.)

            “Ok sir, here’s your ballot.”

            Choice A: “Thanks, here’s the ballot, yay I just voted.” “Sir, you’re under arrest.”

            Choice B: “Um… actually I already voted.” “Yes we know sir, I see it right here, but we were just testing you.” “No, hey, wait, I was trying to test you.” “…”

            It’s not a reasonable expectation to ask actual election workers - poll working volunteers - to do anything like the above, though.

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        5·
        11 hours ago

        Yup it’s only illegal if your peers deem it. Which is why you should always stick to areas where you are a commoner and not an outsider. Which is why I avoid the south like it’s radioactive.