Eight of the country’s 11 supreme court judges will stand down over reforms supported by President Claudia Sheinbaum

Eight of Mexico’s 11 supreme court judges have submitted their resignations after controversial judicial reforms, the top court has said.

In a move that has sparked diplomatic tensions and opposition street protests, Mexico is set to become the world’s only country to allow voters to choose all judges, at every level, starting next year.

The eight justices – including president Norma Pina – declined to stand for election in June 2025, a statement said, adding that one of the resignations would take effect in November and the rest next August.

The announcement came as the supreme court prepares to consider a proposal to invalidate the election of judges and magistrates. President Claudia Sheinbaum, however, has said that the court lacks the authority to reverse a constitutional reform approved by congress.

  • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    2 months ago

    It biases them towards catering to public demand instead of being a neutral arbiter of justice.

    Want to keep your job as judge? Better not be ‘weak on crime’ etc…

    • rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It biases them towards catering to public demand instead of being a neutral arbiter of justice.

      But they’re biased anyway, towards whoever has the power to take away their job. They’re never neutral arbiters of justice.

      • jmcs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        In a well run country that requires a supermajority of some kind of council picked by different groups like some representatives for the judges, others picked by the legislature, etc. which avoids any group having full control of the courts.

      • TomSelleck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Especially in rural areas where they can just legislate criminal justice policy from the bench.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what the founding fathers thought but they end up being biased to whomever gets them the seat. Additionally, if the country decides to become more progressive or conservative, judges either have to be flexible based on public opinion, or they need term limits to make room for change. It’s broken.